Publishers now spend $113M a month buying search traffic

Publishers are spending more on paid search as zero-click behavior erodes organic referrals and changes how brands should measure visibility.

Publishers now spend $113M a month buying search traffic

Publishers are increasingly paying for the search visibility they once expected to earn organically. The latest evidence puts a concrete price on that shift, with large media companies sharply increasing paid-search budgets as organic referrals weaken and more search journeys end on the results page itself.

The pattern matters beyond publishing. Brands face the same basic trade-off: if fewer searchers click through from organic results, marketers can either buy more traffic or make sure their brand, product, or expertise is present inside the answers people see before a click happens.

$113 million in paid-search spend was recorded across Similarweb's Top 100 Media index in July 2026, up 41% year over year and 274% over three years, according to Adweek.

Key Takeaways

  • Publisher paid-search spending is rising faster than the traffic it buys, suggesting tougher auction economics.
  • Zero-click search makes brand visibility inside answers more valuable even when no session is generated.
  • Marketers should track branded demand, AI citations, and answer share of voice alongside conventional search traffic.

Table of contents

Jump to each section:

What the publisher data shows

The July numbers are striking because both spending and acquired traffic are moving quickly, but not at the same pace. Similarweb's publisher index shows that paid-search visits are growing, while the budgets behind them are growing even faster.

23.7 million paid-search visits reached the indexed publishers in July 2026, up 39% year over year and 148% over three years, according to Similarweb data reported by Adweek.

The spending is also concentrated. Adweek reports that Forbes accounted for a large share of the total, while the New York Times also increased paid-search investment. Forbes said it invests in audience growth through both organic reach and targeted marketing, while the New York Times, CNN, and USA Today declined to comment.

That concentration matters because it argues against a simple story in which publishers are indiscriminately buying back every visit they lose. The more plausible picture is targeted acquisition around search queries where the economics can still work, including commerce, subscriptions, or other high-value user actions.

What does success look like in AI search? New KPIs marketers need
Why rankings no longer define visibility and what marketers should measure instead

Why spending is outpacing traffic

When spending grows faster than traffic, one likely explanation is that the auction is getting more competitive. More bidders chasing commercially useful search terms can raise the cost of acquiring the same visit, even if total paid traffic still rises.

That does not automatically make the strategy irrational. Paid search has long been viable when the value of a click is predictable enough. A publisher with a high-converting subscription page, affiliate product page, or other valuable destination can justify paying for traffic in a way that a low-yield article page often cannot.

The tension is that publishers are spending more money inside the same search ecosystem that is sending fewer users outward organically. The result is a more expensive dependency: distribution that once arrived primarily through ranking increasingly requires either direct payment or a different form of visibility.

Why this matters to brands, not just publishers

Publishers are an unusually visible example because traffic is central to their business model, but brands face the same structural change. Search is shifting from a referral engine toward a place where the answer itself can satisfy the query.

68.01% of Google searches ended without a click in the first four months of 2026 in the Similarweb clickstream panel analyzed by SparkToro.

That figure should not be mixed directly with every other zero-click study because panels and methodologies differ. The useful implication is directional: a growing share of search value can happen before a website visit.

For a marketer, that changes what winning looks like. A brand can influence consideration by appearing in an AI Overview, answer box, generative answer, or cited source even if the user never lands on the brand's site. If that visibility is missing, paid search becomes one way to buy back attention, but it is not the only one.

What marketers should do about it

The first adjustment is measurement. Sessions and last-click conversions remain useful, but they no longer capture the full effect of search visibility. Similarweb recommends watching branded query volume as a downstream signal, alongside AI citation frequency and share of voice across answer engines.

The second adjustment is content design. Pages that answer specific questions clearly, organize evidence well, and contain useful original information have a better chance of being cited or summarized by AI systems. The goal is no longer only to rank a blue link. It is to become one of the sources that shapes the answer.

Paid search still has a role, especially for high-intent queries with clear economics. But treating paid traffic as a wholesale replacement for organic traffic can become expensive quickly. The stronger strategy is to use paid acquisition selectively while investing in the content, authority, and brand signals that can earn visibility before the click.

The APAC picture

Zero-click behavior is not uniform across markets, which is especially important for regional marketers. APAC teams should resist applying a single global benchmark to Japan, Southeast Asia, and other markets with different device and search habits.

Zero-click rates ranged from about 41% in Japan and Vietnam to 54% in the Philippines in iPullRank's analysis of 13 billion Google searches.

The same study found relatively small mobile-versus-desktop gaps across several Asian markets compared with major English-speaking markets. That suggests the path to search visibility in APAC needs local measurement, not assumptions imported from the US or UK.

The wider lesson is straightforward. In a zero-click world, visibility is either earned inside the answer or bought beside it. The publishers now spending heavily on paid search show what happens when the first route becomes harder to secure and the second gets more expensive.

This article is produced by ContentGrow. We're building branded media outlets for B2B companies. Interested in learning more? Learn more.